Draft of Form 1099-DA for reporting digital asset transactions released Source: Journal Of Accountancy News Published on 2024-04-23

The IRS, in its release of the draft of the Form 1099-DA for brokers to report digital asset transactions, includes the broad definition of “broker” used in proposed regulations that drew industry ire when issued in 2023.

But that broad definition is not necessarily a cause for concern, said Miles Fuller, senior director of government solutions at TaxBit, a cryptocurrency tax software company, and a former attorney at the IRS. The draft version reflects the language of the proposed regulations, he said.

“They’re just making a form that aligns to what they described (in the proposed regulations),” he said. “They aren’t trying to announce some policy shift in the form.”

The final version of Form 1099-DA, Digital Asset Proceeds From Broker Transactions, will be used to report gross proceeds of digital asset sales and exchanges. The draft version, released Friday, requires brokers to check a box saying whether they are a kiosk operator, a digital asset payment processor, a hosted wallet provider, an unhosted wallet provider, or other.

In the preamble to the proposed regulations (REG-122793-19), posted in the Federal Register in August, the IRS and Treasury explained that the proposed regulations extend information-reporting rules under Sec. 6045 to include brokers who act as agents, principals, or digital asset middlemen to sell digital assets for others. The regulations cover sales or exchanges of digital assets for cash, broker services, and property of a type that is subject to reporting by the brokers. The proposed regulations also extend the reporting rules to brokers who effect, on behalf of customers, payments of digital assets associated with payment card and third-party network transactions subject to reporting under Sec. 6050W.

The proposed regulations also clarified that the definition of broker for purposes of Sec. 6045 includes digital asset trading platforms, digital asset payment processors, certain digital asset hosted wallet providers, and persons who regularly offer to redeem digital assets that were created or issued by that person.

At a public hearing in November 2023, crypto industry advocates said the definition of broker stretched the statutory definition “beyond the breaking point” and adds to security and privacy concerns.

The draft form mainly means one thing — that the process is still moving, Fuller said. “The fact that a (draft) form is out now means we are closer to getting final regulations than we thought last week,” he said. “I don’t know that the form has any indication of what’s going to be in the final regs.”

The same thinking applies to the box on the draft form for wallet addresses, which was another big concern for the crypto industry, he said. If that box was not on the form, then people would think that the IRS was not going to require wallet addresses, he said.

The crypto reporting regulations came in response to amendments to Sec. 6045 made by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, P.L. 117-58, which was signed into law in November 2021. The IRS originally estimated that the regulations would affect 13 million to 16 million owners, a figure that the Service acknowledged could be low, along with up to 9,500 brokers. However, an IRS official said last year that the Service estimated it would receive 8 billion Form 1099-DA information returns.

— To comment on this article or to suggest an idea for another article, contact Martha Waggoner at Martha.Waggoner@aicpa-cima.com.

IRS has mixed results from ‘ghost employer’ enforcement efforts Source: Journal Of Accountancy News Published on 2024-04-22

The IRS’s first attempts to rein in abuse by “ghost employers” — those who pay their workers but do not pay employment tax and federal payroll income tax withholding — had some success, and the Service should ramp up its pursuit, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) said in a recent report. TIGTA says the IRS has difficulty spotting ghost employers because it will have no record of them if they never file returns.

“Ghost Employers present a significant vulnerability to tax administration, as their scheme cannot be detected by existing IRS enforcement streams,” TIGTA said in its report, Criminal Investigation Had Success With Ghost Employers, While Civil Enforcement Efforts Can Be Improved (TIGTA Rep’t No. 2024-300-019 (April 12, 2024)). “Accordingly, it is important for the IRS to assess the risk that Ghost Employers pose to tax administration.”

While employment tax fraud takes several forms, including paying workers in cash to avoid a paper trail of payments, the most egregious ghost employers withhold taxes from employees but do not file employment tax returns and do not make federal tax deposits, the report said.

These unpaid taxes potentially have a big impact on the tax gap, the difference between taxes owed and taxes paid. Taxes paid by employers accounted for about 65% of total tax receipts in 2022, so when they “ghost” employees and Treasury, their actions can have a big impact on the federal government’s bottom line, the report said. Of the total 2022 tax receipts of $4.9 trillion, employment taxes and federal payroll income tax withholding were $3.18 trillion, the report said.

The IRS’s first coordinated and systemic approach to tracking down ghost employers started in November 2017 when the IRS Criminal Investigation (CI) unit began trying to match Forms W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, attached to Forms 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, with the IRS’s payroll tax Forms 941 database to verify whether the corresponding payroll taxes had been filed and paid.

The outcome: 33 people were prosecuted for employment tax fraud, resulting in about $43.6 million in total restitution. Another 136 cases remained active as of May 2023, the report said, pointing out that “the workload and labor time needed to develop these cases are significant.”

The IRS’s civil enforcement effort, which it calls the Ghost Employer Project, was less successful, TIGTA said. As part of its audit, TIGTA requested a status update on 280 cases that had been selected randomly to be reviewed by the Small Business/Self-Employed Division field collection and examination functions.

TIGTA received a spreadsheet that had limited information pertaining to only 178 cases and confirmed that this was the only supporting documentation available.

“Based on our review of the project, we found only seven cases involving potential ghost employers,” the report said. “While several cases are still being worked, including eight by CI, we believe that the Ghost Employer Project resulted in limited success in identifying significant noncompliance activity by ghost employers.”

The Ghost Employer Project faced problems caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and ended in May 2022, even though many cases were still being worked, TIGTA said. It urged the IRS to continue to pursue civil penalties against ghost employers.

“One of the key indicators of fraud that the courts focus on is the failure to file returns,” TIGTA wrote. “For ghost employer cases, the consistent development and proper application of civil fraud penalties will help reduce this activity by imposing tangible economic consequences on taxpayers that engage in those transactions.”

TIGTA made four recommendations: refinements to filters to improve the identification of ghost employers; improved tracking of enforcement actions; addressing recommendations from the Ghost Employer Project team; and reminding collection employees to refer ghost employer cases to examination for potential assessment of civil fraud penalties.

The IRS agreed with all four recommendations.

— To comment on this article or to suggest an idea for another article, contact Martha Waggoner at Martha.Waggoner@aicpa-cima.com.

Updated FAQs provide details on phase-in timing of BOI access Source: Journal Of Accountancy News Published on 2024-04-19

Updated FAQs on beneficial ownership information (BOI) from Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) include details on the timing of the phase in of access to BOI under Section 6403 of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), P.L. 116-283.

In the updated FAQs posted Thursday, FinCEN added a new section on BOI access, a subject that Congress focused on when Director Andrea Gacki testified in February before the House Financial Services Committee.

Access will be phased in, beginning this spring with a pilot program for some federal agency users and concluding in spring 2025, when financial institutions with customer due-diligence requirements will be able to review BOI.

In between, in summer of 2024, access will be granted to Treasury offices and other federal agencies engaged in law enforcement and national security activities that already have memoranda of understanding for access to BSA information and in the fall of 2024 to additional federal agencies engaged in law enforcement, national security, and intelligence activities.

In the winter of 2024, FinCEN will extend access to intermediary federal agencies in connection with foreign government requests. Finally, in the spring of 2025, access will be extended to financial institutions subject to customer due diligence requirements under applicable law and their supervisors.

FinCEN, which administers the CTA, is not accepting access requests now; it will provide further guidance on how to request access in the future, the FAQs said.

When Gacki testified before the House committee, she said the BOI database was “established with the highest level of security for a nonclassified system, set to federal standards, the FISMA (Federal Information Security Modernization Act) standards.”

FinCEN also has standards for anyone authorized to access BOI and will ensure that the information is being accessed only for purposes allowed under the CTA, she said.

FinCEN issued an 82-page final rule on access (RIN 1506-AB59) in December 2023 without details on the timing of the access other than it would be taking a phased in approach to providing access that would begin in 2024.

The updated FAQs address other issues, including the definition of a beneficial owner. FinCEN said trusts, corporations, or other legal entities are not considered beneficial owners, although information about an entity may be used instead of information about a beneficial owner in specific circumstances. It refers to question D.12, added in January 2024, to explain those circumstances.

Previously, FinCEN defined a beneficial owner as an “individual who either directly or indirectly: (1) exercises substantial control over a reporting company … or (2) owns or controls at least 25% of a reporting company’s ownership interests …” That language remains in the updated FAQs.

Other issues in the updated FAQs include beneficial ownership through trusts and the applicability of BOI reporting requirements to S corporations and homeowners associations.

Under the CTA, which Congress passed in 2021 as an anti-money-laundering initiative, reporting companies must disclose the identity and information about beneficial owners of the entities. For new entities incorporated after Jan. 1, 2024, reporting companies must also disclose the identity of “applicants” — defined as any individual who files an application to form a corporation, LLC, or other similar entity.

Reporting companies are required to provide information about both the companies and their beneficial owners and applicants, including full legal name, address, state or tribal jurisdiction of formation, IRS taxpayer identification number, birth date, and other details. Willful violations are punishable by a fine of $591 a day, up to $10,000, and two years in prison with similarly serious penalties for unauthorized disclosure.

BOI reporting requirements are on hold for members of the National Small Business Association and an Alabama businessman, who won a summary judgment in March in their lawsuit over the CTA. FinCEN has said the requirements still apply to all other businesses who must report.

FinCEN estimates that BOI reporting regulations apply to 32.6 million entities with 5 million added each year through 2034.

— To comment on this article or to suggest an idea for another article, contact Martha Waggoner at Martha.Waggoner@aicpa-cima.com.